Notes from the Studio

Should you be concerned about the “new” TikTok?

You’ve probably seen a wave of hot takes about TikTok lately. Here’s the short, grounded version of what’s actually changed, what hasn’t and what you should do about it.

The ownership shift, in plain English

TikTok, previously owned by Bytedance, was required to divest its U.S.-based operations. As part of that deal, majority ownership shifted to a group of American investors and tech companies, including Oracle and Silver Lake.

New owners = new legal agreements. That’s why U.S. users were prompted to accept updated Terms & Conditions.

A lot of online commentary has blurred the lines between what sounds scary and what’s actually new. Let’s separate the two things.

What hasn’t changed

TikTok can use your in-app activity and content to:

  • Power recommendations
  • Serve ads
  • Operate the platform

This is standard practice across social platforms. It’s how feeds work and how ads are funded.

Age restrictions remain the same. Users under 13 still can’t create accounts.

What has changed (and what’s making people leery)

Location Data: The updated Privacy Policy is more explicit about collecting precise location data, depending on your device and app settings. This data is processed “in accordance with applicable law.” Important context: this doesn’t mean TikTok suddenly gained super powers, it means the language is clearer and more specific to meet regulations like the California Consumer Privacy Act.

Pre-upload and AI related content access: Previously, Tiktok disclosed it could access versions of your content without effects applied (for example a marked voice or face). Now the policy explicitly includes: AI-generated materials and content accessed during the pre-upload stage (the drafts folder, and any clips you might create, import or edit in-app before you post). This change is largely about catching up to how modern creation tools actually work, and for example helps suggest trending audio.

Expanded advertising language: TikTok has broadened how it describes data used for advertising, including information collected off the app. This is not unique behavior. It’s functionally similar to a Meta Pixel tracking site visitors or Google Analytics measuring user behavior across websites. In other words: it aligns TikTok with industry norms rather than pushing beyond them.

Generative AI guardrails: TikTok added a dedicated Generative AI section to its Community Guidelines. New rules prohibit using AI-powered bots to manipulate the platform and interfering with TikTok’s own AI tools. This is more about protecting platform integrity than it is about surveillance of users. And we’re seeing most major tech players include clauses like these in agreements.

So … what should you do?

The same thing you should be doing everywhere else online:

  • Review and adjust your privacy settings, both inside the app and for your whole device
  • Disable location services or tracking features you’re not comfortable with
  • Know that less data = less personalization.

If you opt out from certain tracking, your For You Page may feel less dialed-in. That’s the tradeoff and it’s a reasonable one if privacy matters more to you than algorithmic precision.

A note for folks worried about surveillance, fascism, or political misuse

Let’s talk about the fear underneath a lot of this discourse: “Is TikTok new a tool for government surveillance, propaganda, or authoritarian nonsense?”

That anxiety isn’t coming out of nowhere. But it’s also not TikTok specific.

If your concern is that a social platform could be influenced by political power, corporate pressure, or state interests, it’s important to zoom out. The major platforms shaping public discourse today are already led by people and companies who regularly operate under U.S. political pressure. You might remember them sitting on-stage at the 2025 presidential inauguration.

  • Mark Zuckerberg and every Meta product
  • Tim Cook at Apple
  • Elon Musk and X
  • Jack Dorsey Bluesky

These companies already comply with U.S. law, government requests, subpoenas, and political realities—including those shaped by Donald Trump and his administration, past or future. In other words: if your standard is “no proximity to power” that ship sailed a long time ago.

Absolute privacy in 2026 isn’t a setting. It’s a lifestyle choice. And that lifestyle looks off-grid, burner phones, no social media, cash, and maybe a cabin.

For the rest of us? These platforms function as the modern town square. They’re imperfect, corporate, algorithmic, and sometimes deeply frustrating but they’re also where culture, organizing, education, and visibility happen in real time.

I’m happy to chat about your specific use case and what steps you can take.

Sources: Reporting and analysis from Mashable, ABC News, and legal commentary by Rachel Brenke.

Picture of Astrid M. Storey

Astrid M. Storey

Astrid Storey is originally from Panama and arrived in Denver in 2003. During the next two decades, she’s juggled a career in a variety of creative and marketing roles while building her own studio, Storey Creative, with clients in real estate, health care, publishing, and tech.

LinkedIn
Threads

Read More

“In a decade of working with designers,
Astrid has been the most communicative and talented yet.”
— Amber Taufen, Homelight